Solve 2x² − 8 = 0

2x² − 8 = 0 has a common factor of 2 sitting in front of everything, and taking it out first is what turns an awkward-looking equation into an obvious one. Divide both sides by 2 and the equation becomes x² − 4 = 0, which is a difference of two squares with roots 2 and −2. Dividing an equation by a...

Type the equation as it is written — it does not have to be in standard form. (x − 2)(x + 3) = 5x − 1 is an ordinary quadratic, and rearranging it into ax² + bx + c = 0 is most of the work. Roots come out exactly: fractions where they are rational, simplified surds like (3 + √17)/4 where they are not, and exact complex pairs where the curve misses the axis. If the squared terms cancel, the equation was linear all along and this solves it rather than complaining.

THE EQUATION

Powers with ^, brackets, fractions and terms on both sides all work. Any single letter can be the unknown.

TWO REAL ROOTS

x = 2 or −2

Both roots are rational, so the quadratic factors: 2(x − 2)(x + 2) = 0.

As typed2x^2 - 8 = 0
Expanded2x² − 8 = 0
Standard form2x² − 8 = 0
Factored2(x − 2)(x + 2) = 0

EACH ROOT PUT BACK, EXACTLY

2 → 0

−2 → 0

sum 0 against −b/a = 0

product −4 against c/a = −4

DISCRIMINANT

64

positive, so two real roots

AXIS OF SYMMETRY

x = 0

the roots sit either side of this

AS DECIMALS

2, −2

exact — the roots are rational

FACTORS OVER ℚ

yes

the discriminant is a square number

WHAT IS HAPPENING

1Expand both sides and collect

2x² − 8 = 0

Brackets multiplied out and powers expanded, with each side written as a multiple of the square, a multiple of the unknown, and a constant.

2Move everything to one side

2x² − 8 = 0

Subtracting the right from the left. Only now is the equation in the form the quadratic formula expects, and for most equations as they are actually written this step is the bulk of the work.

3Work out b² − 4ac

(0)² − 4(2)(−8) = 64

This single number decides the shape of the answer: positive gives two roots, zero gives one, negative gives a conjugate pair with an imaginary part.

4Two rational roots

x = 2 and x = −2

The discriminant came out a square number, so the roots are fractions and the quadratic factors over the rationals.

5It factors over the rationals

2(x − 2)(x + 2) = 0

A product is zero exactly when one of its factors is zero, so each bracket gives a root directly. Factoring is quicker than the formula when it is available, and it is available precisely when the discriminant is a square number.

THE CURVEthe curve crosses the axis twice, and the crossings are the roots−4.44.436.1−13.4filled circles are the roots · the gold circle is the turning point at (0, −8)

Why the formula is worth trusting over factoring. Factoring is faster when it works, and it works only when the discriminant is a square number — which across quadratics with two real roots and small coefficients is 21.2% of them. On the other four fifths, time spent hunting for factors is time spent looking for something that is not there. The formula never fails to apply, and this page shows the factorisation whenever one genuinely exists so you can see which case you are in rather than guessing.

HOW THE ROOTS ARE BUILTthe formula gives a centre and a step: the roots sit the same distance either side of the axis0−b ÷ 2a2−2centre 0, step ±0the step is √(b² − 4ac) ÷ 2a, which is zero exactly when the discriminant is

Exact surds throughout · each root is substituted back symbolically, not numerically

Created with❤️byeaglecalculator.com

HOW TO USE

  1. 1

    Notice that 2 divides every term. Dividing both sides by 2 gives x² − 4 = 0 and loses nothing, because 2 is not zero.

  2. 2

    Recognise the result as a difference of two squares: x² − 2², which factors as (x − 2)(x + 2).

  3. 3

    Set each bracket to zero, giving x = 2 and x = −2.

  4. 4

    Check in the original rather than the simplified version: 2(4) − 8 = 0 and 2(4) − 8 = 0, since both roots square to 4.

WORKED EXAMPLE

2x² − 8 = 0 Every term is divisible by 2, so divide both sides: x² − 4 = 0 This is the difference of two squares, so it factors: (x − 2)(x + 2) = 0 giving x = 2 and x = −2. Check in the original equation, not the simplified one: 2(2²) − 8 = 8 − 8 = 0, and 2((−2)²) − 8 = 8 − 8 = 0. Both roots square to 4, so both give the same arithmetic. By formula instead: a = 2, b = 0, c = −8. The discriminant is 0² − 4(2)(−8) = 64, and the roots are (0 ± 8) ÷ 4 = ±2. Same answer, more steps. One thing to be careful about. Dividing an equation by a number is always safe, because a number cannot be zero unless you wrote it. Dividing by an expression containing the unknown is a different matter: 2x² − 8x = 0 divided by x gives 2x − 8 = 0 and the single root 4, quietly discarding x = 0, which also satisfies the original. Factor such an equation instead of dividing it.

REFERENCE RULES

RuleWhat it saysWhy
Standard formax² + bx + c = 0Everything has to reach this shape first. For most typed equations that is the work.
The formulax = (−b ± √(b² − 4ac)) ÷ 2aAlways available. Factoring is quicker when it is possible, which is not often.
The discriminantb² − 4acPositive gives two roots, zero gives one, negative gives a complex pair.
Factoring is the exception21.2% of real-root casesHunting for factors on the rest is time spent on something that is not there.
When it factorsthe discriminant is a square numberThat is the exact test. No guessing required.
The axis of symmetryx = −b ÷ 2aThe roots sit an equal distance either side of it.
Roots as surds(3 + √17)/4, not 1.7808The surd is exact; a decimal put back into the equation misses zero.
The x² term may cancel(x+1)² = x² + 5Then the equation was linear all along, with one solution.
Complex roots come in pairsp + qi and p − qiThey differ only in the sign of the imaginary part.
Sum and product−b/a and c/aA check that never touches the formula that produced the roots.
The formula can cancelwhen b² is far larger than 4acOne root becomes a difference of nearly equal numbers. 90% failed in doubles.
Not linear, not quadraticx³ is refusedA cubic needs different methods entirely, so it gets a reason rather than a number.
The unknown in a denominator1/x is refusedNot a polynomial equation. Multiplying up first may make it one.
Where the formula comes fromcompleting the square, in generalThat method has its own page here; the formula is it done once with letters instead of numbers.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

x = 2 and x = −2. Dividing both sides by 2 gives x² − 4 = 0, a difference of two squares that factors as (x − 2)(x + 2). Both roots check out in the original: 2(4) − 8 = 0 either way, since both 2 and −2 square to 4.

  • ·x = 2 and x = −2
  • ·Divide by 2 to get x² − 4 = 0
  • ·Factors as (x − 2)(x + 2)
  • ·Both square to 4, so both check out

RELATED CALCULATORS

MORE ALGEBRA CALCULATORS

Was this calculator helpful?

Last updated: September 1, 2026 · Exact surds throughout, never floating point · The equation does not have to be in standard form before you type it.