The area of a square is s², and running it backwards is where it gets interesting. The side is √A, which comes out as a plain number only when the area is a perfect square — and perfect squares thin out fast. There are 100 of them below ten thousand and 1,000 below a million: one in a hundred, then ...
A = s² forwards, √A backwards, and a third question that costs money. Tiling a square floor does not take area ÷ tile area — it takes whole rows and whole columns, because a tile cut to fill a gap at the end of a row is the wrong shape for the end of a column. Ordering by area falls short on 75% of floor-and-tile pairs, by 12.5% on average when it does. The animation lays the tiles and shows the offcuts.
The side, the area, or a floor and a tile. Whole numbers, decimals and fractions all work.
SIDE
AREA
25
The square root of this area comes back to 5, so nothing is lost going either way.
| Side | 5 | 5 |
| Area | 25 | 25 |
THE ANSWER PUT BACK
s² = (5)² = 25 ✓
SIDE DOUBLED
100
four times the area, not twice
SIDE HALVED
25/4
a quarter, not a half
TILES OF SIDE 1
25
whole rows and columns, not the area
THE SIDE
5
as you gave it, kept exact
WHAT IS HAPPENING
A = 5 × 5 = 25
The area counts the unit squares that tile the shape: a row of s of them, repeated s times. That is why the units come out squared, and why a length in centimetres gives an area in square centimetres.
Why the area calculation under-orders. Dividing the floor area by the tile area assumes every offcut can be used somewhere else, and it cannot. A tile cut to fill the gap at the end of a row leaves a strip the wrong shape for the gap at the end of a column, and the corner needs a piece cut in both directions at once. So the honest count is whole rows times whole columns. Across a large sample of floor-and-tile pairs the area calculation fell short 75% of the time, by 12.5% on average when it did, and by 60% in the worst case — which is a second trip to the merchant rather than a rounding difference.
Exact values throughout · surds kept as surds, never rounded away
Choose what you have — a side, an area, or a floor with a tile size — and type it in. Fractions such as 3/4 and decimals both work.
Read the exact value first. Where the side is a surd, that surd is the answer and the decimal beneath it is a rounding.
In tiling mode, compare the two counts. The headline is what the floor needs; the card beside it is what ordering by area would have suggested.
Watch the tiles being laid. Anything pale hanging past the gold outline is bought whole and cut, which is exactly where the two counts diverge.
Take a square of side 5. The area is 5 × 5 = 25. The picture behind that is a row of five unit squares repeated five times, which is why an area is measured in squared units: five metres by five metres gives twenty-five square metres. Backwards is less tidy. An area of 25 gives a side of exactly 5, because 25 is a perfect square. An area of 20 gives √20 = 2√5, about 4.4721, and no decimal is exactly right. That is the normal case: below ten thousand only 100 whole numbers are perfect squares, and below a million only 1,000. The gaps between them keep widening, so the larger the area, the less likely a tidy side. Now the tiling. A square room 10.1 metres across, tiled with one-metre tiles. By area: 10.1² = 102.01 square metres, divided by 1 square metre a tile, rounded up, is 103 tiles. By the floor: 10.1 ÷ 1 = 10.1, so you need 11 whole rows, and 11 whole columns, which is 11 × 11 = 121 tiles. The difference is 18 tiles, and it is not a rounding error. The area calculation assumes the 0.1-metre strips cut off the end of each row can be reassembled to cover the last row, and they cannot: they are 0.1 by 1, while the last row needs pieces 1 by 0.1 laid the other way, and the far corner needs a piece 0.1 by 0.1 cut from a whole tile of its own. Of the 121 tiles bought, 102.01 square metres of tile ends up on the floor and 18.99 is offcut — 15.7% waste. Smaller tiles waste less, because the overhang is only ever one tile wide: the same room tiled at 0.5 metres needs 21 rows of 21, which is 441 tiles covering 110.25 square metres, for 7.5% waste. When the tile divides the side exactly, the two counts agree and nothing is cut. A 10-metre room at one metre is 10 rows of 10, which is 100 tiles, and 100 is also what the area gives. Finally the scaling. Sides of 5, 10 and 15 give areas of 25, 100 and 225. Tripling the side makes the area nine times larger, not three, because two lengths are multiplied together and the scale factor applies to both.
| Rule | What it says | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Area | A = s² | A row of s unit squares, repeated s times. That is why the units square. |
| Backwards | s = √A | Rational only when the area is a perfect square, which is uncommon. |
| Perfect squares thin out | one in √N | 100 below 10,000; 1,000 below a million. The gaps keep widening. |
| Scaling | k times the side, k² the area | Triple the side and the area is nine times larger, not three. |
| Tiles along an edge | ceil(s ÷ t) | Rounded up. A part-row still costs a whole row of tiles. |
| Tiles needed | ceil(s ÷ t)² | Rows times columns. This is what you have to buy. |
| Ordering by area | A ÷ t², rounded up | Falls short 75% of the time, by 12.5% on average when it does. |
| Why it falls short | offcuts are the wrong shape | A piece cut for a row end does not fit a column end. |
| When the two agree | t divides s exactly | Then nothing is cut and both counts are the same. |
| Waste | 1 − s² ÷ (bought × t²) | The share of what you buy that ends up as offcut. |
| Smaller tiles waste less | but cost more to lay | The overhang is one tile wide whatever the tile size. |
| Half the side | a quarter of the area | The same square law, running the other way. |
| Area of a square metre | in square centimetres | Squared, not linear — see the rectangle page for the general rule. |
| A square is a rectangle | with l = w | Every rectangle formula applies, with both sides the same. |
Multiply the side by itself: A = s². A square of side 5 has an area of 25. The picture behind it is a row of s unit squares repeated s times, which is why the units come out squared — metres by metres gives square metres.
Circle Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Triangle Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Right Triangle Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Rectangle Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Sphere Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Slope Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Cylinder Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Slope Between Two Points Calculator
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 1 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 2 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 3 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 4 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 5 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 6 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 7 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 8 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 9 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 10 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 11 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Circle with Radius 12 — Area and Circumference
Calculate instantly →
Last updated: September 1, 2026 · Exact values throughout, surds kept as surds · Tiling takes whole rows and columns, not area divided by area.